testsuite: Bump T9630 allocations as a result of 33de71fa06d0
authorBen Gamari <ben@smart-cactus.org>
Sat, 5 May 2018 17:08:04 +0000 (13:08 -0400)
committerBen Gamari <ben@smart-cactus.org>
Sat, 5 May 2018 17:09:18 +0000 (13:09 -0400)
This patch made the simplifier inline nested function bindings less aggressively
and, while it didn't seem to affect nofib, appears to have regressed T9630
rather considerably.

testsuite/tests/perf/compiler/all.T

index 237b74a..903c05f 100644 (file)
@@ -1266,10 +1266,11 @@ test ('T9630',
       [ compiler_stats_num_field('max_bytes_used', # Note [residency]
           [(platform('x86_64-unknown-mingw32'),   39867088, 15),
           # 2017-12-24:                     34171816 (x64/Windows)
-          (wordsize(64), 35324712, 15)
+          (wordsize(64), 42664296, 15)
           # initial:    56955240
           # 2017-06-07: 41568168     Stop the specialiser generating loopy code
           # 2018-02-25: 35324712     It's not entirely clear
+          # 2018-05-05: 42664296     Don't inline nested function bindings as aggressively
           ]),
       extra_clean(['T9630a.hi', 'T9630a.o'])
       ],