T14732 now passes with the profasm way
authorAlp Mestanogullari <alp@well-typed.com>
Sun, 27 May 2018 15:48:01 +0000 (11:48 -0400)
committerBen Gamari <ben@smart-cactus.org>
Wed, 30 May 2018 14:02:10 +0000 (10:02 -0400)
Simon PJ recently fixed the problem behind this failure
so we can now expect this test to pass in all ways again.

The fixes got introduced in the following commits:
  86bba7d519fb6050f78b7e3bac2b3f54273fd70e
  d191db48c43469ee1818887715bcbc5c0eb1d91f

Test Plan: T14732 (profasm way)

Reviewers: bgamari, RyanGlScott, simonpj

Reviewed By: RyanGlScott, simonpj

Subscribers: simonpj, RyanGlScott, rwbarton, thomie, carter

GHC Trac Issues: #15163

Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D4725

testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_compile/all.T

index 0d5b210..7ed58f5 100644 (file)
@@ -598,7 +598,7 @@ test('T14590', normal, compile, ['-fdefer-type-errors -fno-max-valid-substitutio
 # output we expect (T13032.stderr).
 test('T13032', omit_ways(['hpc', 'profasm']), compile, [''])
 test('T14273', normal, compile, ['-fdefer-type-errors -fno-max-valid-substitutions'])
-test('T14732', expect_broken_for(15163, ['profasm']), compile, [''])
+test('T14732', normal, compile, [''])
 test('T14774', [], run_command, ['$MAKE -s --no-print-directory T14774'])
 test('T14763', normal, compile, [''])
 test('T14811', normal, compile, [''])